Satyameva Jayate

Thursday, December 26, 2013

Edward Snowden warns of loss of privacy in Christmas message

Former US National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden, who revealed details of electronic surveillance by American and British spy services, warned of the dangers posed by a loss of privacy in a message broadcast to Britain on Christmas Day.

In a two-minute video recorded in Moscow, where Snowden has been granted temporary asylum, he spoke of concerns over surveillance and appeared to draw comparison with the dystopian tale "1984" which described a fictional state which operates widespread surveillance of its citizens.

"Great Britain's George Orwell warned us of the danger of this kind of information. The types of collection in the book - microphones and video cameras, TVs that watch us are nothing compared to what we have available today."
"We have sensors in our pockets that track us everywhere we go. Think about what this means for the privacy of the average person," he said.

"A child born today will grow up with no conception of privacy at all," said Snowden. "They'll never know what it means to have a private moment to themselves, an unrecorded, unanalyzed thought. And that's a problem because privacy matters, privacy is what allows us to determine who we are and who we want to be."

The "Alternative Christmas Message", broadcast annually on Britain's Channel 4 television since 1993, mimics the format of the yearly address to the nation by Queen Elizabeth.
Previous participants have included then President of Iran Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2008 and popular cartoon characters Marge and Lisa Simpson in 2004.

On Tuesday, Snowden - who disclosed thousands of confidential documents - said in an interview published in the Washington Post that he had achieved what he set out to do.
"For me, in terms of personal satisfaction, the mission's already accomplished," he said.

Snowden left his NSA post in Hawaii in May and went public with his first revelations from Hong Kong a few weeks later.
In June, he left for Russia and stayed at Moscow's Sheremetyevo airport for nearly six weeks until the Kremlin granted him temporary one-year asylum.

The United States has revoked his passport and demanded he be sent home to face charges for stealing secrets.
Earlier this month there were signs of thawing attitudes when Richard Ledgett - a top NSA official who leads a task force at the agency responding to the leaks - left open the option for Snowden to return to the United States in an amnesty.

"It's worth having a conversation about," he told CBS.

"I would need assurances that the remainder of the data could be secured and my bar for those assurances would be very high," Ledgett said. Senior officials in the Obama administration remain opposed to such a move.
Last week a White House-appointed panel proposed curbs on some key NSA surveillance operations, recommending limits on a program to collect records of billions of telephone calls, and new tests before Washington spies on foreign leaders.

"The conversation occurring today will determine the amount of trust we can place both in the technology that surrounds us and the government that regulates it," Snowden said in the Christmas address.

"Together we can find a better balance, end mass surveillance and remind the government that if it really wants to know how we feel, asking is always cheaper than spying."

Arvind Kejriwal: We have called Congress's bluff; if they withdraw support, they'll be the villains

NEW DELHI: Arvind Kejriwal was an atheist. He turned a believer some time back. You can almost understand why - how could a fringe movement for an anti-corruption law turn into such a huge movement unless god was on his side? After Delhi, he's drawing up plans for the 2014 Lok Sabha election. And he's brimming with confidence. TOI's Neha Lalchandani met him on Wednesday at his residence for an exclusive interview. Excerpts from a free-wheeling conversation on a host of issues.

Congratulations on your stunning victory.
(smiles) Thank you. It's the people's victory.

Yours was so far a movement, but now it's a political party. What does this transformation mean to you?

When we were in the movement, we were pleading with the government over and over again to legislate the Lokpal Bill, but it didn't respond. Gradually we realized that the character of the present system is such that petitions wouldn't work. If they are the problem, they can't take action against themselves - they're steeped in corruption and would never pass the Lokpal Bill. Therefore, we have now entered politics. Annaji used to say that politics is keechar (muck). We have now entered the keechar to clean it up ourselves. We know we don't have a magic wand which we will wave and correct everything. Nor do we have the knowledge to solve all the problems. But we do know that if all of Delhi's 1.5 crore people get together and want to do something, there is nothing that can't be done. Collectively we can, together we can. Five-six ministers or a handful of bureaucrats can't solve the problems of Delhi. Secondly, there is the question of niyat (intent). Congress and BJP don't have it, but our intentions are good and we will find solutions to problems.

It's not possible that everyone who entered politics came with the wrong intention. Is there something about politics and power that corrupts?

That's a fair point. First, all those who have entered the system entered as individuals. In Congress, for instance, there might be one or two good ministers. But Congress as a party, is a corrupt party. In contrast, AAP is a party of upright people and the entire team is coming in with a good intent. But if we think that we can provide good governance in the present system, that's not possible. The system will soon overpower us and we will get sucked into it. So, we will have to change the system completely and for that our solution is swaraj. We will have to implement a system that no longer depends on individuals but works by itself. Why do we have to approach MLAs for ration cards, cleaning waste or improving roads? These things should happen on their own. When there is decentralization, when governance is in the hands of the people, at least colony-related issues like water, power, parks, medicines and schools will get solved.


Initially, you said you didn't want to take the support of Congress. But now you have. What changed?

We don't have an alliance with Congress in Delhi. They have offered support and we are ready to take it, but it's not an alliance. When Congress suddenly claimed it would give us outside support, they also started criticizing us for not taking on responsibility, while claiming our promises can't be fulfilled. Many of our supporters started questioning us. Then we asked for 10 days' time and decided to go back to the people. We had no idea that there would be such overwhelming opinion for us to form the government. I personally did not want a tie-up and would have liked a re-election. But we respected what the people said. Our supporters feel that if Congress takes back support now, they will be the villains.

It now appears that Congress is quite uncomfortable with the fact that you're forming the government. Is it because you called their bluff?

Yes, we called their bluff. They have given their support and we will take it at face value and implement our manifesto for which people have voted for us.

Including probes into issues of corruption that might involve the previous government?

Yes, we will implement our manifesto.

Has Rahul Gandhi called you up? Or any other senior Congress leader?

There has been no communication. I had written one letter to the Congress president and they responded to it. There has been no further communication or phone calls.

How does your swaraj actually work?

The first step is legislation. The law has to be drafted. We have invited S C Behar, former chief secretary of Madhya Pradesh, to Delhi to act as an advisor and help us in drafting this law. He is an expert on decentralization and tried to implement something in MP but the government in power then did not allow him to do so. He is coming to Delhi this evening and will stay here for the next few months. Drafting the law is probably the easy thing. Getting the law passed in the Assembly will be our biggest challenge.

Once that's done, the next step is implementation. Delhi has 272 wards. Each will be divided into an average of 10 parts. That gives us roughly 2,720 mohallas. Demarcating the mohallas on the map will be a huge exercise. Assets like roads, lanes, dispensaries, primary schools, etc., will have to be transferred to each mohalla. Each mohalla will have a small secretariat with one or two employees after which there will be local elections to chose a representative. His only job will be to convene monthly meetings and to get decisions implemented through the local Mohalla sabha secretariat. This entire exercise should take us six to eight months.

But you may not get 6-8 months...

I can't say how long this government will last because it will be there on their (Congress) support but whenever it falls and there will be re-election, I see AAP winning that with an overwhelming majority.

Your good intentions apart (which is your claim), how is AAP different from the personality-driven Congress or an ideology-driven BJP?

I really don't know how ideology driven BJP is because both BJP and Congress have the same ideology: corruption. In that sense, AAP stands out from both these parties. We have already been transparent about our funding, we have fought elections in a very tight budget.

Your movement is now mass based. Mass movements draw all kinds of people. How can you say that everyone in AAP is a person with the right intention?

You had earlier asked me about our movement now becoming a political party. Frankly, the party itself is a movement. We have won this election because of our volunteers. There are so many people who have left their homes and jobs to work for us. It's not a political party in the conventional sense. If people with the right intent enter the system and change it, only then can such a movement have permanence. There are systems that work around the world and we need to bring in a good system into the party and into governance. The system itself will then filter out the wrong kind of people. We screened our candidates thrice before confirming their nomination but there should also be systems in place to weed out the wrong kind of people. Office bearers are also checked. But everyone is welcome to be a party worker. We have no checks for them.

You have said that your promise to provide 700 litres of free water will be fulfilled within 24 hours of your assuming office. How?

We did not promise to make water available to everyone, we promised to make 700 litres of water free to those who have water connection. For this only an executive order is needed. The real problem is distribution. Each colony has different kinds of water issues that will have to be looked into. For instance, Ambedkar Nagar, Sangam Vihar, Mehrauli and Devli can get water from the Sonia Vihar treatment plant. A pipeline passes close to these areas and from what I know, a pipe network has been provided in these colonies. It's only a matter of connecting them with the main pipeline and maybe building an underground reservoir. The reason why this work has not been done is because a huge tanker mafia is operating in these areas, and both Congress and BJP are involved in it. It is a business of hundreds of crores.

And how will you cut power tariff by 50%?

We do not have the exact calculations for this. There is, however, evidence of a lot of wrong doing in the books of power distribution companies. In 2002, when privatization took place, it was said that there were losses of 60% in power distribution in Delhi. And that after privatization, these losses would come down, revenue would go up and accordingly power tariff in Delhi would fall. Today, distribution losses have come down to 15%. This 45% reduction in unmetered, unpaid electricity translates into thousands of crores. Where has this money gone? Far from tariff coming down, it has gone up threefold since then. This needs to be audited. Secondly, in 2010, discoms declared losses of Rs 630 crore but when their accounts were checked, it was found that they had instead made a profit of Rs 3,577 crore. Thirdly, both discoms, BSES and NDPL, have created sister concerns from whom they purchase equipment. In the 2010 order, they have shown a bill of Rs 1,200 crore on purchase of equipment that actually cost Rs 800 crore. These sister concerns are also a front to create artificial losses. For instance, one discom purchases power at Rs 6 per unit and supplies it to one such concern for Rs 2.70. Why are they buying this surplus power and transferring the losses to the people of Delhi? Last year, DERC had checked 15,000 connections. Out of these, 10% were shown to have zero billing in the discom's account. When consumers were questioned, they claimed to have paid bills. So if they have paid, but the discoms are showing zero billing, where did the money go? All this raises serious questions about their accounts which need to be audited.

But how will you audit these companies? CAG tried but the high court did not give permission as they are private companies.

An audit is possible as per the CAG Act. We are already working on how this audit can be done. I can't tell you how, but this audit is possible and will be done.

It's said that before the Delhi assembly introduces a bill in the assembly, it has to be referred to the Centre for its nod. If that's so, how will you pass the Lokpal Bill or create mohalla sabhas?

The Constitution says that Delhi Assembly can legislate on state subjects with certain exceptions. If the state has to legislate on a subject that is repugnant to an existing Central law, then that will need the President's assent. However, in August 2002, the transaction of business rules was changed in Delhi by an executive order, which now says that the Delhi government has to first get a new law approved by the Centre before it can be introduced in the Assembly. This smacks of colonial times when London had to clear laws. Now, how can the transaction of business rules supersede the Constitution of India? It can't. The kind of swaraj model we have in mind will certainly need the Centre's nod but we will seek that only after passing the law in Delhi Assembly. Under swaraj, we are practically taking away all power from the state and handing it over the people.

And the Centre will approve your new law?

Let's see. If it doesn't give approval then the chief minister of Delhi and its people will sit on dharna outside the home ministry!

How seriously are you about the 2014 Lok Sabha elections?

There is very strong buzz about AAP across the country. Hordes of people are coming for our meetings. There may be some rural areas, where media outreach is absent or restricted, where we might face a problem. We have decided that we will field candidates where ever we find worthy people. Therefore, it's not possible to say whether we will contest 20 seats, 200 or 400. The hunt for good people has started.

But you've already announced that you will contest all 26 seats in Gujarat...

No, we haven't decided so far. Some local AAP enthusiasts might have said that, but as a party we haven't decided.

In Delhi you had a team which was able to identify good candidates. How will you replicate the exercise when you extend to areas where you don't even have a support base?

The party has a strong network across the country that will find out about prospective candidates.

Will you tie up with like minded organizations like the Lok Satta party in Andhra Pradesh?

We are already in touch with many of them.

Now that you are eyeing a national election, you must have policies other than corruption. What's your foreign policy or your economic policy? Your referendum model certainly won't work here... We are working on our policies. On foreign policy, we would of course like to have friendly relations with all our neighbours, and be on equal terms with all countries. You are right...referendums can't be used to decide subjects like currency, foreign policy, banking etc. And mohalla sabhas will have to work within existing systems of law. They can't, like khap panchayats, issue illegal orders. Then the law will kick in.

Surveys say that many people who voted for AAP in Delhi would vote for Narendra Modi in the Lok Sabha election. Now that your party has aspirations for the Centre, what message will you put out?

(smiles) We have plans. Let's wait and watch. There are five months still left for elections. And five months is a very long time in politics.

In the next five months you are likely to get tied down in Delhi. How will you campaign across the country in the coming polls?

What we achieve in Delhi will affect people in every village in the country. When Delhi holds its assembly session in Ramlila Maidan, it will fire the imagination of the whole country. If Delhi does away with the lal batti culture, people in other parts of the country will ask their ministers to follow our lead. When I refuse to stay in a bungalow and live in a flat, it will be expected out of other leaders too that they live like the aam aadmi. It's by our performance that we will campaign in the Lok Sabha election.

You were once an atheist. Now there's Ganapathy in your room as well as a picture of Shirdi Sai Baba. What made you a believer once again?

Yes, I was once an atheist. But look at our movement in the last three years. Is it possible to go from where we were to where we have reached today without divine support?

With people's support...

Of course, with people's support. But that wouldn't have come unless there is also a divine role.





Tuesday, December 24, 2013

AAP Ki Sarkar: Arvind Kejriwal's top five promises to Delhi


New Delhi:  Arvind Kejriwal's one-year-old Aam Aadmi Party has dazzled Delhi with a litany of promises that have been laughed off by its mainstream political rivals as unimplementable. The party may have just two and a half months to walk the talk. With the national election just five months away, a model code of conduct could soon be in place, so no government can take any steps to influence voters. Speaking to NDTV, Mr Kejriwal said, "We will deliver."

1. The party has insisted that it will end VIP culture in Delhi. A report says Mr Kejriwal has decided to scrap what is seen as the most "offensive symbol" of that culture - red beacons or lal battis on vehicles. No AAP minister will ride in a lal batti car, or stay in the traditional bungalows allotted to ministers, he has reportedly said.

2. Mr Kejriwal's pledge to reduce water and electricity bills has been described as impractical by the outgoing Congress, which is supporting the AAP. The fledgling party vowed to halve the power bills and conduct an audit of discoms, or electricity distribution companies, accused of overcharging consumers.

3. The AAP has vowed to provide 700 litres of free water to every household in Delhi. According to some estimates, that would cost the state some 340 crores a year.

4. The party has also promised "swaraj" or self-rule. To translate its idea of direct democracy into action, it has planned "mohalla sabhas" or neighbourhood meetings to decide on policies. The 272 meetings held across Delhi last week to invite public opinion on whether the AAP should form a government with Congress support, offered a preview of these mohalla sabhas.

5. The party promised to bring in a strong law for a Lokpal or an anti-corruption ombudsman within 15 days. The demand for a Lokpal was at the centre of Anna Hazare and Arvind Kejriwal's campaign in 2011. Since then, the two men have drifted apart, with Anna Hazare backing the Centre's Lokpal Bill passed in Parliament last week, and Mr Kejriwal rubbishing it as a weak law designed to protect politicians.

Snooping row: Trouble for Modi, more audio tapes to be released

New Delhi: More trouble in store for BJP prime ministerial candidate and Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi as news portal Gulail is planning to release new audio tapes on the alleged snooping row.
The tapes reportedly show how state machinery was used to tap the phone and stalk the woman in and outside Gujarat. Two news portals, Cobrapost and Gulail, had claimed on November 15 that Modi close-aide Amit Shah had ordered illegal surveillance of a woman in Gujarat at the behest of one "saheb".
They had released purported taped conversation between Shah and IPS officer GL Singhal to support their claim but said the authenticity of the tape could not be confirmed.
However, the father of the woman had told the National Commission of Women that his daughter does not want any probe into the issue as there was no encroachment of her privacy. "It is an earnest wish of my daughter that no further probe (in snooping issue) is necessary as being politically demanded," he had said in a letter to NCW and Gujarat State Commission for Women.

After security, Delhi CM designate Arvind Kejriwal says no to bungalow

New Delhi: After refusing security cover, Aam Aadmi Party chief and Delhi Chief Minister designate Arvind Kejriwal has refused a bungalow. Delhi Chief Secretary DM Sapolia reportedly proposed a bungalow for Kejriwal as Chief Minister, to which he said no.

"Kejriwal refused the offer. There has not been an official communication, but Arvind refused the offer," said AAP leader Manish Sisodia.

Kejriwal is all set to take over the Chief Minister of Delhi and is likely to take oath on December 26 at Ramlila Maidan, the nerve centre of the Anna Hazare-led anti-corruption agitation in 2011.

The AAP is finalising its Cabinet for which the consultation process is on. IAS officer and former power secretary Rajendra Kumar also met Kejriwal on Tuesday as AAP is in the process of shortlisting officers to serve as principal secretaries to its ministers.

On Monday, keeping his words over not holding a security cover for himself, Kejriwal in response to a letter by the Additional Commissioner of Police Security refused the security that was offered to him.

"Thank you for offering me the security. But as I already informed earlier, I don't need any security. I don't need any escort or PSO. God is my biggest security. However I would be grateful if some help is provided for crowd management at a few places where i get mobbed," he wrote in his letter to the Additional Commissioner of Police.

Delhi Police in its letter to Kejriwal had requested details of the security arrangements that the CM designate wanted for him.

"The Delhi police has been providing security cover to the Chief Minister of Delhi as the Chief Minister is given 'Z' category protectee status. Since Mr Arvind Kejriwal is going to take over as Chief Minister of Delhi, Delhi Police needs to give the security cover to him as per the norms. Kindly indicate where the security personnel should report to Shri Arvind Kejriwal," Additional Commissioner of Police V Renganathan had written to Kejriwal.

AAP which had won 28 seats in the 70-member Assembly was the second party that met Lieutenant General Najeeb Jung to stake claim after the Bharatiya Janta Party which had won 32 seats refused to form the government due to lack of a majority.

Arvind Kejriwal's AAP says will probe corruption charges against Congress leaders

New Delhi: With Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) chief Arvind Kejriwal all set to become the Chief Minister of Delhi, all eyes will be on the activist-turned politician whether he will walk the talk and order probe into corruption charges involving Congress leaders. 

Making his party's stand clear, AAP leader Yogendra Yadav told a television news channel that his party would certainly not stop the party to initiate a probe against the Congress leaders, whose name have cropped in various scams, even if the government collapses.

Underlining that AAP doesn't have any alliance with the Congress and it will rely on its 28 MLAs in the Delhi Assembly, Yadav reiterated that from the beginning they have maintained that the probe against Congress and BJP leaders involved in various scams will be pursued. 


Interestingly, the AAP is forming the government in Delhi with outside support from Congress, so every move of the party will be watched carefully. 

Being critical of the Congress party, senior AAP leader Prashant Bhushan also said that given the Congress' track record it is to be seen how long the coalition government lasts. 

Making it clear that AAP won't accept any of Congress' conditions and implement its own agenda and fulfil promises, Bhushan said, "If Congress and BJP join hands to pull down our government, it's their wish." 

"Given the past track record of the Congress party, I don't expect that our government will survive for long... One month, four months or six months, it is to be seen," Bhushan said. 

AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal is set to be Delhi's seventh chief minister after staking claim Monday to take power with Congress backing -- amid vocal doubts about the government's stability. 

Without acknowledging the support of Congress' eight legislators, a visibly confident Kejriwal asserted that the Aam Aadmi Party, which has 28 seats in the 70-member assembly, had the majority to rule Delhi. 

Kejriwal is set to be Delhi's seventh chief minister after staking claim Monday to take power with Congress backing -- amid vocal doubts about the government's stability. 

Without acknowledging the support of Congress' eight legislators, a visibly confident Kejriwal asserted that the Aam Aadmi Party, which has 28 seats in the 70-member assembly, had the majority to rule Delhi. 

The 45-year-old Magsaysay award winner will be facing enormous public expectations as he led AAP to a stunning victory capitalising on people's disillusionment with mainstream political parties. 

Kejriwal is likely to have little over two months' time to deliver on his immediate priorities as model code of conduct for the Lok Sabha polls are set to come into force in March. 

 His running of government will be watched carefully as he led AAP to the victory in the December 4 Assembly polls, criticising the "corrupt" Congress government on almost all aspects. 

Kejriwal defeated Congress Sheila Dikshit by over 25,000 votes.

'Nitish Kumar will die at the hands of Narendra Modi' says BJP's Giriraj Singh

New Delhi/Patna: Outspoken BJP leader Giriraj Singh courted controversy after he claimed that Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar will die at the hands of Narendra Modi if the BJP fails to win all the 40 Lok Sabha seats in the state. 

Singh, who served as minister for Animal Husbandry before removed after BJP-JD(U) split on June 16, has been a vocal opponent of Nitish Kumar.


Addressing a public gathering, Singh said, “If BJP does not win 40 out of 40 seats in Bihar then Nitish Kumar would not be just finished but he will die at the hands of Narendra Modi, no one else.” 

Singh had once termed Nitish Kumar a "dehati aurat" (rural woman) as he was quarreling with Narendra Modi out of "jealousy". 

Reacting to Singh's statement, JD(U) leader Ali Anwar said, “It is not surprising that they are using such language, the BJP is fascist and it is their ideology, they will murder democracy also.”

Notwithstanding the grandstanding, JD(U) leaders have also been very vocal against Narendra Modi. 

Bihar's Agriculture Minister Narendra Singh had said, "Narendra Modi is the biggest terrorist in the country and it is only natural that he talks about threat to the country from terrorists. One who kills others feels threatened and always moves around security in the fear that he might be killed."

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

Narendra Modi most searched Indian politician on Google, who is No. 2?

New Delhi: BJP’s prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi has emerged as the most searched Indian politician on Google, says the search giant in its Zeitgeist report 2013. 

Also, Narendra Modi’s coronation as BJP’s prime ministerial candidate was the most searched news event in 2013. Zietgeist, which covers all search categories, answers the question of what the world searched for in a particular year. 


Next on the Top 10 list in the ‘politicians’ category is Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi, followed by his mother Sonia Gandhi. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Tamil Nahu Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa complete the top 5. 

At number 6 is the man behind the Aam Admi Party phenomenon, Arvind Kejriwal. Next on the list is Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav. Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, Congress general secretary Digvijay Singh and Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Sushma Swaraj, make up the bottom three, in that order. 



1.Narendra Modi
2.Rahul Gandhi
3.Sonia Gandhi
4.Manmohan Singh
5.Jayalalitha
6.Arvind Kejriwal
7.Akhilesh Yadav
8.Nitish Kumar
9.Digvijaya Singh
10.Sushma Swaraj

Devyani Khobragade case: Meet Preet Bharara, the Indian-American prosecutor who brought down Rajat Gupta and took action against the diplomat



India's Deputy Consul General in New York Devyani Khobragade would be fairly small fry for US Attorney Preet Bharara - the New York-based federal prosecutor who won the biggest ever insider trading case last month, against SAC Capital.

But Indian-born Bharara has made it clear that there is no offender too big - or too small - to escape his attention. This month alone, actions initiated by his office and convictions include those against Wall Street executives, tax evaders, drug and arms dealers and an Indian American pharmacy owner in Queens.

The escalating diplomatic row between India and the US over the arrest and treatment meted out to Khobragade is in fact the second such tussle set off by the actions of Bharara's office this month. She is charged with giving false information and documents to support her domestic help's visa application.

On December 5, Bharara announced charges against 25 serving and former Russian diplomats and their spouses for allegedly defrauding Medicaid, an American state-run health care programme, to obtain about $1.5 million in benefits over a decade. No arrest was made in that case and Bharara said the case was unlikely to go to trial as the defendants had immunity. At a news conference held to announce the charges, Bharara said it was a case "we would be prosecuting and making arrests in, but for immunity". But he noted that participation in crimes by diplomats generally leads to expulsion from a country.

The charges drew a sharp rebuke from Russia's Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov who blamed the criminal case on "Russophobic forces", although the US state department downplayed the case saying it should not affect bilateral ties.

Talking about Khobragade's case, State Department Deputy Spokesperson Marie Harf said: "The US and India enjoy a broad and deep friendship, and this isolated episode is not indicative of the close and mutually respectful ties we share."

As the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Bharara is considered to be one of the most powerful prosecutors in America and was handpicked by US President Barack Obama for this position in May 2009. His term expires next year and it is widely speculated he could run for higher political office. One of his predecessors, Rudy Giuliani, went on to become the Mayor of New York City and was a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination in 2008.


Eat less, never think you are old, says Advani

Hear your inner voice, eat less and never think you are old, is what Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) veteran L.K. Advani said are the three lessons he has learnt from life.

"Hear your inner voice to find meaning in life, eat less and never think you have become old," Advani told a gathering on Tuesday at the launch of his three books in New Delhi, compiled from the blogs he has been writing.

Stating he found both meaning and happiness in life, Advani, 86, said he took criticism in his stride.

"I was labelled a Hindu fanatic and when I visited Pakistan in 2005, I was charged with revolting from my party ideology," he said.

He thanked Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh chief Mohan Bhagwat for sparing time to launch his books - "My Take" in English and "Rashtra Sarvopari" and "Drishtikon" in Hindi.

"It is my privilege that the head of an organisation with which I have been associated since the age of 14 years is launching my books," said Advani.

Bhagwat was all praise for Advani.

"He does what he says. National interest has been supreme behind his words. It is proven," said Bhagwat.

Leader of the opposition in the Lok Sabha, Sushma Swaraj, said she was amazed at the regularity and the range of topics covered in Advani's blogs.

"We never thought he would write regularly. We are left wondering over the wide range of topics he has written about," Swaraj said while urging the gathering to gain from the wisdom in Advani's three books.

In a lighter vein, she pointed out that sometimes Advani was critical of party leaders in his blogs but she always takes it as an advice from the party veteran.

"Our adversaries may be happy over the criticism but he (Advani) has a right to criticise and scold us for our mistakes," she said.

Yoga guru Baba Ramdev also heaped praise on Advani for his long career in politics.

The dignitaries present on the occasion included leader of the opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley, Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Shivraj Chouhan, former minister Arun Shourie and BJP leader Smriti Irani.

Congress loss in 4 states made Lokpal Bill top priority for govt

NEW DELHI: According to the Lokpal Bill passed by the Rajya Sabha, an official will not be given a hearing at the stage of a preliminary inquiry. This was part of the select committee's unanimous recommendations tabled in Parliament more than a year ago.

Lokpal became top priority for the government after Congress lost elections in four major states and the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) made astunning political debut in the Delhi assembly polls.

The bill's passage in the upper House on Tuesday evening is seen as the culmination of the popular anti-corruption agitation that swept India in 2011 when Gandhian activist Anna Hazare undertook three fasts for a lokpal.

The bill was discussed without disruptions as Samajwadi Party MPs kept away from proceedings after party chief Mulayam Singh Yadavmet Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Congress president Sonia Gandhi on Tuesday morning.

With the principal detractors absent, the bill drew all around support, with the exception of theShiv Sena, and the government also accepted two key amendments that had not been part of the bill when it was tabled on Friday.

With the government accepting all the select committee's recommendations, the vastly transformed bill will be considered afresh by Lok Sabha on Wednesday. Once both Houses approve the legislation, it will be sent to President Pranab Mukherjee for notification.

Parliament has tried to pass Lokpal Bill eight times previously. The bills to create a lokpal to investigate corruption in high places lapsed seven times in the past while it was withdrawn once in 1985.

The bill brings the PM under its purview with certain safeguards. It also covers ministers and MPs besides all government employees.

Law minister Kapil Sibal, who moved the bill for passing, hailed the occasion as a "historic" day and hoped all states would pass similar legislations to set up Lokayuktas modelled on this bill.

The Lokpal Act will be a model law for states who will have to set up Lokayuktas within a year. Though it will be the discretion of the states to make some changes a Lokayukta will be a reality in all states.

Jaitley, while supporting the bill, said he was happy the government had accepted all the changes in "this changed environment" — an oblique reference to the Congress getting a drubbing in assembly elections as well as strong pro-transparency movements.

Sibal said the law alone would not eliminate corruption but it could help deal with those who are corrupt. On the issue of bringing the Prime Minister under the purview of the new law, he said the overall consensus was in this favour although there were some "discordant individual views" opposing it.

Except for the BJP's demand that there should not be a provision for religion based reservations in the lokpal, the government accepted all the suggestions of the main opposition party without which it was not possible to pass the bill. The government saw the issue as one of representation rather than reservation.

Left parties' demand to bring the private sector and NGOs under the lokpal was also not accepted. The CPM leader Sitaram Yechury, therefore, moved an amendment to bring public-private-partnership (PPP) projects in the ambit of the lokpal but it was defeated overwhelmingly by 151 against 19 votes.

Sibal said the government intended to bring more legislations like the Prevention of Corruption Bill to fight corruption and they could be passed if the House functions properly.

Defending the inclusion of judges in the lokpal panel, Sibal said it was done as "complex legal" issues are involved. Lawmakers cannot be part of it as it involves conflict of interest, he said.

BJP member Ravi Shankar Prasad took a dig at the government saying, "Better late than never, had this Bill been passed in 2011, it would have been better... The person who becomes the lokpal must understand the enormity of the power."

Prasad also thanked Hazare for his movement for the Lokpal Bill. However, he also took a dig at AAP chief Arvind Kejriwal saying, "We know what people who were once with Anna are now doing."

TMC MP Sukhendu Sekhar Roy questioned as to why judges should be heading institutions like the Lokpal Bill. He said this citing the sexual harassment case against former Supreme Court Justice A K Ganguly. Concluding his statement, Roy thanked the government for accepting suggestions on the Lokpal Bill saying, "We support the bill wholeheartedly."

Congress MP MS Gill said he supports the bill, but had objection to bringing the Prime Minister under the proposed legislation. He said that there were other mechanisms to carry out investigations against the PM of the country. "The country must reduce the suspicion of public servants. They do great service to this country," said Gill.


All you want to know about Lokpal Bill

NEW DELHI: Following are the salient features of the amended Lokpal Bill passed on Tuesday by the Rajya Sabha.

1. Lokayuktas: The new bill mandates states to set up Lokayuktas within 365 days. States have the freedom to determine the nature and type of Lokayukta.

The old bill said the law shall be applicable to states only if they give consent to its application.

The old bill gave power to the central government to appoint state Lokayuktas while the new draft gives this power to the states.

2. Constitution of Lokpal: The Lokpal will consist of a chairperson and a maximum of eight members, of which fifty percent shall be judicial members. Fifty percent members of Lokpal shall be from among SC, ST, OBCs, minorities and women.

The older version said the chairperson shall be the Chief Justice of India or a present or former judge of the Supreme Court or a non-judicial member with specified qualifications (chief justice or a judge of a high court).

3. Selection of Lokpal: The selection committee will have Prime Minister, Lok Sabha Speaker, leader of the opposition in Lok Sabha and the Chief Justice of India. A fifth member of the selection committee for selection of Lokpal under the category of "eminent jurist" may be nominated by the President on the basis of recommendation of the first four members of the selection committee.

In the old bill, selection of the fifth person was left entirely to the President.

4. Religious bodies and trust: The new bill includes societies and trusts that collect public money, receive funding from foreign sources, and have an income level above a certain threshold, it excludes bodies creating endowments for or performing religious or charitable functions.

The old bill expanded definition of public servant by bringing societies and trusts which receive donations from the public (over a specified annual income) and, organisations which receive foreign donations (over Rs 10 lakh a year) within the purview of the Lokpal.

5. Prosecution: In the new version, before taking a decision on filing a chargesheet in a case upon consideration of the investigation report, the Lokpal may authorise its own prosecution wing or the concerned investigating agency to initiate prosecution in special courts.

Under the old bill, prosecution of the case could be done only by the prosecution wing of the Lokpal.

6. Central Bureau of Investigation: For independence of the CBI, in the new bill a directorate of prosecution will be formed. Appointment of the director of prosecution will be on the recommendation of the Central Vigilance Commissioner.

Transfer of officers of CBI investigating cases referred by Lokpal will be only with the approval of Lokpal who will also have superintendence over CBI in relation to Lokpal referred cases.

7. Hearing: The new bill says a government servant will get a hearing before a decision is taken by the Lokpal.

8. Prime Minister: The Prime Minister will be under the purview of the Lokpal with subject matter exclusions and specific process for handling complaints against the Prime Minister.

9. Investigation: Inquiry has to be completed within 60 days and investigation to be completed within six months. Lokpal shall order an investigation only after hearing the public servant.

Inquiry against the prime minister has to be held in-camera and approved by two-thirds of the full bench of the Lokpal.

10. Penalty: False and frivolous complaints - imprisonment up to one year and a fine of up to Rs.1 lakh. Public servants - imprisonment up to seven years. Criminal misconduct and habitually abetting corruption - jail term up to 10 years.


Lokpal's journey to transparency

1966 

Morarji Desai led First Administrative Reforms Commission recommends setting up of Lokpal at Centre and Lokayukta in states to look into complaints against public functionaries, including MPs

1968-2001 

Successive governments introduce Lokpal bill eight times

2002 

Justice MN Venkatachaliah led Constitution Review Commission stresses the need for Lokpal and Lokayuktas

2004 

UPA-I's national common minimum programme promises that Lokpal bill would be enacted

2005

Veerappa Moily led Second Administrative Reforms Commission reiterates that Lokpal be established without delay

2011

Jan: UPA-II's GoM headed by Pranab Mukherjee suggests a range of anti-corruption measures, including the Lokpal bill

Apr 5: Anna Hazare begins his first fast at Jantar Mantar demanding enactment of Jan Lokpal bill drafted by his team

Apr 9: Anna ends fast as the government forms a joint drafting committee consisting of ministers and civil society members

Jun 21: The last meeting of the drafting committee ends with the two sides coming up with separate drafts

Aug 4: Govt introduces a Lokpal bill, widely attacked as fl awed

Aug 8: Bill referred to standing committee

Aug 16: Anna launches second fast for Jan Lokpal bill

Dec 22: Govt re-introduces Lokpal and Lokayuktas bill

Dec 27: Lok Sabha passes bill

Dec 29: Introduced in Rajya Sabha

2012

Re-introduced in Rajya Sabha. Referred to select committee

2013

Dec 10: Anna Hazare begins fast in his village in Maharashtra, demanding urgent introduction of a new anti-corruption law

Dec 13: Amended bill tabled in Rajya Sabha

Out of jail, Lalu vows to take on Narendra Modi, Nitish Kumar

Patna: The Rashtriya Janata Dal seems to have got a shot in the arm with the release of its leader Lalu Prasad. He walked out on bail on Monday and has already vowed to take on Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar and BJP Prime Ministerial candidate Narendra Modi.

"I have come out of jail and now I will keep a check on Narendra Modi and BJP. We won't let them divide the country," Lalu said after coming out of the jail. Minutes after he walked out of jail, Lalu made his political agenda clear - vowing to take on opponents Narendra Modi and Nitish Kumar in the coming elections.

Convicted in the fodder scam case, Lalu cannot contest in the coming elections, but his impact on Bihar's politics can't be ignored. The Congress, which faced a humiliating defeat in 4 state assemblies this year is weighing its options in Bihar, hoping to form an alliance with either Lalu or the JDU. The JDU, however, says Lalu poses no threat to them.

"Lalu's release on bail is based on the court's decision. It is not a political development," said Nitish Kumar.

Lalu Prasad has walked out of Ranchi's Birsa Munda prison with renewed strength and vigour, but the task at hand is much tougher than before. He not only has to counter the Modi mania sweeping the nation, but also has to counter his arch political rival Nitish Kumar, who has used all tricks at his disposal to disturb Lalu's political castle while he was away.

With 2014 polls already knocking the doors, Lalu indeed has his hands full for coming months. With four more fodder scam cases pending against him, it remains to be seen whether Lalu can script a comeback.

Sexual harassment: MHA seeks legal opinion on FIR against AK Ganguly

The government seems to be paving the way for action against former Supreme Court judge Justice AK Ganguly after allegations of sexual harassment against him. Sources say that the Home Ministry is now seeking legal opinion on the matter.

Sources say the legal opinion is being sought to ascertain if an FIR by the Delhi Police is needed to proceed in the matter.

ALSO SEE AK Ganguly seeks 4 weeks to respond to NCW notice on sexual harassment.

The procedure now is that the Home Ministry will send a report to the President who will ask the Supreme Court for an enquiry. As per the Human Rights Act, the Chairperson of a Human Rights Commission can be removed only on grounds of proven misbehaviour as ascertained by the Supreme Court.

Pressure has been mounting on AK Ganguly to resign from the post of Chairman of the West Bengal Human Rights Commission in the wake of sexual harassment charges leveled against him by a woman lawyer. Justice Ganguly has sought four weeks' time from National Commission for Women which had asked him to explain his position.

The Commission had taken a suo motu cognisance in the case and had sent notice to him on December 6 to explain his position post the indictment by the three-member panel of the Supreme Court.

Ganguly, who retired from the apex court more than a year ago, was accused by the intern of sexually harassing her, a charge strongly denied by him, in a hotel room in Delhi in 2012.